North Carolina | ¹ū¶³“«Ć½ Our Members Bring Choice, Value & Innovation to Agriculture Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:59:20 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.4 /wp-content/uploads/2023/09/fema-favicon-75x75.png North Carolina | ¹ū¶³“«Ć½ 32 32 New Online Tool Maps ā€˜Beans Gone Wild’ /news/new-online-tool-maps-beans-gone-wild/ Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:57:10 +0000 /?p=24276 Pests, disease and wild weather can wreak havoc on crop performance. As first-line troubleshooters, crop consultants, North Carolina State Extension agents and specialists have their fingers on the pulse of statewide crop performance and recently released an online tracking tool called ‘‘ to capture and share in-season crop problems and recommendations. 

The new visual mapping tool, funded by the NC Soybeans Producers Association and the NC Agricultural Foundation, uses crowd-sourced field data from public and private partners to document soybean problems (and recommended actions) across the state. Rolling data rotates off every six weeks, providing a current view of problem reports across the state.

 ā€œIn the past, we didn’t always have timely or accurate information on what’s occurring where,ā€ said Jeff Chandler, NC Soybean Producers Association Research Coordinator. ā€œThis tool will provide access to real-time problem identification that can be synthesized with Extension recommendations to provide better decision support.ā€

Source:

]]>
Judge Says Animal Activists Can Secretly Record at Work /featured-small/judge-says-animal-activists-can-secretly-record-at-work/ Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:23:39 +0000 /?p=10769 A U.S. District Court judge handed a victory late last week to animal-rights advocates by declaring that parts of North Carolina’s Property Protection Act violated the First Amendment’s free-speech provisions.

Legislators passed the act in 2015 as activists were publishing evidence of cruelty at North Carolina animal-agriculture operations. Supporters of the act argued that activists should not be allowed to misrepresent themselves to get hired and sneak cameras into the workplace.

ā€œI don’t think an employee, or somebody doing deceptive things, ought to be able to go and collect evidence of whatever wrongdoing that’s out there,ā€ said Republican Rep. Chuck McGrady during the debate. ā€œIt’s personal property, folks. It’s something that’s protected in our constitution.ā€

Lawmakers crafted the measure so that it didn’t look like other states’ ag-gag bills. Instead of imposing criminal penalties, the bill allowed employers to sue employees who plant hidden cameras, make secret recordings, capture or remove documents from their workplaces, or interfere with the ā€œpossession of real property.ā€ And it didn’t single out agriculture.

The judge’s 73-page ruling last week delicately dissected the law. Some provisions, he wrote, violated the First Amendment on their face. Others were unconstitutional when applied to the type of undercover work done by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF).

Employers could still sue their workers for constitutionally unprotected acts, he wrote—for example, ā€œopening a gate to let livestock out.ā€

Source: Successful Farming

]]>